Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Tesiant antropomorfine tema, galima eksperimentuoti ir su veido elementais, kurie pridedami pakeicia pagrindinio objekto prigimti. Tikras transhumanizmas :).

Rytoj is pacio ryto vaziuoju i Indianapoli reikia parodyt zmonems kas darosi su ju medziagomis. Net kartais keista, kad zmones dirba su tomis medziagomis daugiau nei simta metu ir dar iki siol nesupranta, kodel jos pasizymi tokiomis savybemis kokiomis pasizymi.

9 comments:

  1. Šita nuotrauka labai graži. Įsivaizduoju, kad dabar taip žiūri tie apdegę medžiai Australijoje...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pirmiausia išvarva akys?

    ReplyDelete
  3. as, kai pamaciau sia nuotrauka (po to kai padariau :) ) kazkodel galvojau jai geriausias pavadinimas yra "scarface" bet visai ne del to, kad man filmas patiktu ar Al Pacino, bet siaip del randu ir aliuziju i veida.

    Galvojau puse savo keliones apie medzius Australijoje ir manau, kad jie butent taip gali ziureti ... taiklus pastebejimas.

    ReplyDelete
  4. O kodėl Tau nepatiko "Žmogus su randu", Mini? Sakyčiau, labai vyriškas kinas. P.S. Man patiko.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Buka, man is principo nepatinka filmai apie visokias mafijas ir nusikaltelius. Kaip nepatinka ir tai, kad pvz. lrytas visada pirmajame puslapyje visada apraso henytes gyvenimo peripetijas, lyg jis butu koks nors svarbus asmuo, o ne nusikaltelis. Taip pat nepatinka ir tai, kad visoje Lietuvos spaudoje kai sugaunamas ar nuzudomas koks nusikaltelis nepamirstama paskelbti jo pravardes, lyg tai butu vienas is svarbesniu to nusikaltelio atributu. As tai tik matau, kaip tokio gyvenimo stiliaus reklama ir pateikima kaip siekiamybes pavyzdi, kas man yra svetima.
    Todel man visai nepatiko Scarface ypac kaip jis ten be samones sklaidosi su automatu po savo namus ir visa kita.
    Be viso kito "Krikstatevis" yra kitas filmas kuriuo as niekada nesizavejau, kaip ir "sopranai", kai dar turejau televizoriu visada perjunkdavau kita kanala, kad neziureciau tos nesamones.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ford Coppola use excellent different characters in The Godfather. The movie are very earthy despite gun, violence and power between people. If you are aware of these factors, The godfather is a great film. We always used violence in one form or another. Think about Rome Empire and their rampage.

    But I were going to write about that painted clay face. Origin people use those mask often, we should do the same, in western countries.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Barbro, thank you for taking time and browsing through my blog. I hope it's not too boring.

    As for the Godfather, you might be right about the characters, however i would not think that the only way to reveal characters is through violence, but of course it might be one of the easier ones. Yes, we did always used violence, but it does not mean that we need to continue to do so. One thing that i abhor is constant glorification of "analysis" of most violent and criminal events in our society. That way propagating them into the future generations.

    Masks, why would you think that people in western countries do not wear them ? they are just less noticeable and hidden under the acting, or they become faces :)
    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  8. okey, we can carry role or personas (personas come from Carl. G. Jung) as we use in different situations, home, work, etc. The best are not to use any role at all, just be those who we really are.
    Mask, those origin people use, were among other things, a purpose for taken themself to other worlds during trance.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.